TB 500 vs. BPC 157

BPC 157

Numerous studies have examined the characteristics and possible research applications of two possible tissue repairing peptides, BPC 157 and TB 500. Like other peptides, they are modified versions of naturally occurring proteins artificially altered to improve their abundant potential characteristics. Research has suggested that both peptides may offer anti cell aging properties and may strengthen the immune system. However, comparing BPC 157 with TB 500 is reasonable since the two peptides are distinct and serve different purposes. Here are some research cases where BPC 157 could be more efficacious than TB 500 and vice versa.

BPC 157 vs. TB 500: Wounds

Studies suggest that wounds and tissues may recover more quickly when presented with TB 500 and BPC 157. Body protection compound (BPC) 157 is a derivative hypothesized to affect fibroblasts’ migration and proliferation. These cells repair the extracellular matrix in a concentration-dependent manner. TB 500, a form of Thymosin beta-4 (Tβ-4), has been theorized to have a comparable effect influencing actin filaments. One of the most important proteins in cell movement and reproduction is considered to be actin. Studies suggest that TB 500 may improve immune system cell function and migration and speed up fibroblast development and migration.

BPC 157 vs. TB 500: Vascular Development

A network of strong blood capillaries is required to transport tissue repairing and immunological cells to an injured area. Repairing any wound, whether a musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or neurological injury, requires responsive blood vessel formation, according to the research.

A vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) hormone is the principal regulator of blood vessel development. Research suggests that while BPC 157 may raise the amount of VEFG receptors (also known as VEGFR2), TB 500 might enhance VEGF production directly. Although they may use different angles to solve the same problem, both peptides have been speculated to promote the development of essential blood vessels.

TB 500 vs. BPC 157: Heart

Though more studies have concentrated on TB 500 for its potential for cardiovascular function, it still appears to produce strong results. Data from studies examining TB 500 for over 20 years hints at the peptide’s many practical impacts on cardiovascular function. In addition to reducing inflammation and scarring that may contribute to long-term issues like heart failure, TB 500 has been purported to promote the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells, potentially increasing oxygen supply to the delicate heart muscle.

While TB 500 has been extensively studied for its potential for heart function, BPC 157 has received much less attention. Researchers speculate that the antioxidant actions of BPC 157 may be among its most notable potential characteristics. A potent free radical and significant issue after a heart attack, malondialdehyde (MDA) may be neutralized by BPC 157, research suggests.

While both peptides may potentially safeguard cardiovascular function, TB 500 may have a leg up due to abundant information on its role in this domain. Both have suggested promise in animal studies, but BPC 157 has had less investigation into its potential cardiovascular properties, so keep that in mind if you’re trying to decide what to buy for your research. Choose biotechpeptides.com for the highest-quality research compounds.

BPC 157 vs. TB 500: Gut

BPC 157’s parent chemical was extracted from stomach juice. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that BPC 157 is assumed to be potentially useful in studies related to gastrointestinal healing. Studies on BPC 157 have purported that it may promote the healing of gastrointestinal tract injuries of all kinds, focusing on fistulas. The typical fistula takes two years or more to heal fully, and this is because fistulas are prevalent in inflammatory bowel disorders such as Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis. Data suggests that BPC 157 may shorten its duration to only one month in rat models. Thus, findings imply that the healing rates of fistulas seem to be about 25 times higher when BPC 157 is presented than when the wound heals naturally.

Although the peptide is not at the top of the list for gastrointestinal properties, TB 500 has still be considered in the course of gastrointestinal research. As suggested by study findings, TB 500 may significantly improve recovery rates from severe bacterial infections when used with antibiotic compounds. There seems to be a synergistic effect between TB 500 and various antibiotics. Given the alarming rate at which infections may develop resistance to conventional antibiotic solutions, this has been an interesting research hypotheses for scientists to pursue.

BPC 157 vs. TB 500 and Muscle

When it comes to damage to bones, ligaments, and tendons, the comparison between TB 500 and BPC 157 is as close as it gets. Extensive testing in this field has implied that both peptides may aid animal models.

Investigations purport that tendon development may be accelerated by BPC 157, which might increase fibroblast migration, cell survival, and proliferation. BFGF, EFG, and VEFG levels are speculated to rise after BPC 157 presentation in tendon healing studies. Wounds appear to heal more quickly when these growth factors are present in larger concentrations.


[i] T. Huang et al., “Body protective compound-157 enhances alkali-burn wound healing in vivo and promotes proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis in vitro,” Drug Des. Devel. Ther., vol. 9, pp. 2485–2499, 2015, doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S82030.

[ii] K. N. Dubé and N. Smart, “Thymosin β4 and the vasculature: multiple roles in development, repair and protection against disease,” Expert Opin. Biol. Ther., vol. 18, no. sup1, Art. no. sup1, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1459558.

[iii] M.-J. Hsieh et al., “Therapeutic potential of pro-angiogenic BPC157 is associated with VEGFR2 activation and up-regulation,” J. Mol. Med., vol. 95, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00109-016-1488-y.

[iv] K. M. Kassem, S. Vaid, H. Peng, S. Sarkar, and N.-E. Rhaleb, “Tβ4-Ac-SDKP pathway: Any relevance for the cardiovascular system?,” Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 589–599, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2018-0570.

[v] A. D. Shaghiera, P. Widiyanti, and H. Yusuf, “Synthesis and Characterization of Injectable Hydrogels with Varying Collagen−Chitosan−Thymosin β4 Composition for Myocardial Infarction Therapy,” J. Funct. Biomater., vol. 9, no. 2, p. E33, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.3390/jfb9020033.

[vi] M. Baric et al., “Stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 heals rectovaginal fistula in rats,” Life Sci., vol. 148, pp. 63–70, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.02.029.

[vii] T. W. Carion et al., “Thymosin Beta-4 and Ciprofloxacin Adjunctive Therapy Improves Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Induced Keratitis,” Cells, vol. 7, no. 10, Art. no. 10, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.3390/cells7100145. [viii] D. Gwyer, N. M. Wragg, and S. L. Wilson, “Gastric pentadecapeptide body protection compound BPC 157 and its role in accelerating musculoskeletal soft tissue healing,” Cell Tissue Res., vol. 377, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00441-019-03016-8.

Related Articles:

Can Cannabis Help Your Workout?

What is medical cannabis?

Scroll to Top